Sanders' "Justice Is Not For Sale Act"

Paragraph 1 of 4. The 'Justice Is Not For Sale Act': Senator Sanders leads the charge against for-profit prisons, saying, "It is morally repugnant and a national tragedy that we have privatized prisons all over America.'" With a call to "end the private prison racket in America," a group of progressive lawmakers on Thursday introduced a bill that seeks to subvert the reigning "pro-incarceration agenda" by banning private prisons, reinstating the federal parole system, and eliminating quotas regarding the number of immigrants held in detention http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/09/17/justice-not-sale-sanders-leads-charge-against-profit-prisons 

Paragraph 2 of 4.  Black and brown Americans and voters who have mentally ill relatives should especially support Sanders' bill to eliminate federal contracts with privatized prisons. This would help end mass incarceration in the USA and reduce police violence. Police officers are issued arrest quotas and often resort to violence in order to meet the quotas. Ethnic persons and the mentally ill of all races are targeted with particularity. 

Paragraph 3 of 4.  Sen. Sanders' Justice is Not For Sale Act, co-sponsored by Reps. Raúl M. Grijalva (D-AZ), Keith Ellison (D-MN) and Bobby L. Rush (D-IL), would prohibit the federal government from entering contracts with private prison corporations within two years of the bill’s enactment. Instead, state and local government will be solely responsible for overseeing state and local correctional facilities.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/09/17/3702659/bernie-sanders-prison-bill/

Paragraph 4 of 4.  "Legal Victories" readers are encouraged to request their representatives to co-sponsor the bill. Those who withhold support for the "Justice Is Not For Sale Act" are likely prison investors. Unfortunately, decision makers on the government's payroll are allowed to engage in conflicts of interest and benefit financially by introducing and voting for legislation that increases their own stock portfolios. Judges, prosecutors, crime laboratory technicians, and even some defense attorneys own stocks in private jails and prisons. This is the main cause of corruption in America's very criminal courts. A congressional bill should be introduced to force elected and appointed officials to divest or resign.  http://divestorresign.blogspot.com/

The willingness of some lawmakers to introduce just legislation is refreshing. Thank you in advance for sharing this article to make more Legal Victories.

Call and write with information about legal victories you wish to highlight. 

Messages will be responded to within 48 hours, or please try again.
Email
MLJ@HumanRightsDemand.com
MaryLovesJustice Neal
MaryLovesJustice@gmail.com
Phone (678)531.0262 (cellphone) or (571)335-1741 (Google voice)
I endure First Amendment rights violations; therefore, please try again if you receive no response to your initial phone message or email.

The Cochran Firm a Court-Declared FRAUD

VICTORY!

The (Johnnie) Cochran Firm was declared by federal court NOT to be a national law firm. United States District Court of Central California ruled in “Cochran Firm vs. McMurray”:

“Cochran Cherry Givens & Smith, P.C. (“CCGS”) has unclean hands in advertising itself as a national law firm when there is no evidence that the individual offices are connected other than through agreements.”

The Cochran Firm is a FRAUD. Its clients are predominantly African Americans, many of whom entrusted their legal cases to this “law firm” in good faith and were defrauded by their own lawyers. The so called “national law firm” usually follows the CoIntelPro mandate to “keep wealth from black hands.” Examples of racism, malpractice, and fraud are published by Mary Neal, a The Cochran Firm fraud victim, in an article entitled “Beware of Treacherous Lawyers: The Cochran Firm” and in “Cochran Firm Fraud” blog.

By Order dated May 12, 2015, the Court ruled that The Cochran Firm does not meet the definition of a law firm under the California Rules of Professional Conduct. CCGS, together with all of the individual regional offices, does not fit this definition.

THE COCHRAN FIRM IS A NOW A COURT-DECLARED FRAUD PERPETUATED AGAINST ITS CLIENTS, ITS ATTORNEYS, COURTS, OPPOSING ATTORNEYS AND PLAINTIFFS, PARTNERING LAW FIRMS, ADVERTISERS, STATE BARS, AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC, ESPECIALLY PEOPLE OF COLOR.

See the Order and information in “The Cochran Firm Fraud Fails in CA Court.”
http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2015/06/cochran-firm-fraud-fails-in-ca-court.html

Attention Lawyers:

We, the defrauded former clients of this so-called "national law firm," which has shamed the legal profession and defrauded courts of law as well as its own clients, attorneys and partners, require legal representation for our racketeering claim against The Cochran Firm frauds. Please read the list of defrauded former clients and choose a single case, or choose to represent all interested parties in a class action case. Just leave your website link as a comment to this article. If you telephone the writer, hackers generally interrupt or redirect my phone calls to other parties who lie and claim to be Mary Neal, or they allow you to leave me a message which will be deleted without my hearing it. They also redirect and steal my emails. Thank you.

This is a victory for legal consumers, particularly African Americans. 

#BlackLivesMatter

Call and write with information about legal victories you wish to highlight. 

Messages will be responded to within 24 hours, or please try again.
Email
MLJ@HumanRightsDemand.com
MaryLovesJustice Neal
MaryLovesJustice@gmail.com
Phone (678)531.0262 (cellphone) or (571)335-1741 (Google voice)
I endure First Amendment rights violations, as evidenced in "Justice Gagged"
http://JusticeGagged.blogspot.com
See our schedule of Blogtalkradio programs on "Human Rights Demand" and "NNIA1"
http://MLJradio.blogspot.com
Please see a list of MaryLovesJustice Blogs and Radio Shows
http://marylovesjustice.blogspot.com/2014/03/marylovesjustice-blogs-and-radio-shows.html
New this year: Book authors are invited to inquire about having your books featured by MaryLovesJustice. Only books about legal or social justice issues are featured.
http://MaryLovesJustice.blogspot.com
If stalkers render any of the seven(7) links inoperable, simply copy/paste them into a new tab to escape censorship, or search for the titles. Thank you for reading and sharing this article to celebrate the fact that the justice system does sometimes work!

Estate Planning for Parents of Developmentally Challenged and Mentally Ill Children

Assistance to the Incarcerated Mentally Ill (AIMI) seeks input from #lawyers who have advice for parents of children or adults with Autism, epilepsy, Downs syndrome, and mental illness. The time to establish trust funds and name reliable executors to their children's estates is now. AIMI does not want to write articles about these children being cruelly incarcerated for their mental illnesses and developmental disabilities weeks after their parents' demise if this could be avoided by proper planning.

If you have advice for middle class people who wish to prepare for their children with such disabilities and some with elderly parents experiencing old-age dementia, AIMI would appreciate your input. Please write or recommend articles about preparing for the continuing needs of mentally challenged relatives after one's demise. Most AIMI members are poor or middle class families, but there must be some arrangements that middle income people can make so that their mentally challenged loved ones will be less likely to experience homelessness, incarceration, or police violence after the main caretakers' deaths.

Many of the families with whom AIMI works are headed by people who are approaching middle age and worry how their grown children who have mental dysfunctions will manage after their own demise. Every day, young couples give birth to children who have Down syndrome, Autism or some other impairment. Estate planning for these families is of the utmost importance. Do you have advice and provide services for them, lawyers?

Attorneys who wish to advertise with AIMI should email Mary Neal, AIMI's director at the addresses below. Reasonable rates apply. Potential clients need criminal lawyers and civil rights attorneys as well as estate lawyers. Your legal services will be featured and run indefinitely at "Dog Justice for Mentally Ill" articles http://DogJusticeforMentallyIll.blogspot.com and will be mentioned during our "Assistance to the Incarcerated Mentally Ill" and/or our "Human Rights Demand" radio broadcasts. I would welcome interviewing an estate law firm about preparing for sick and disabled people when mom and dad are no longer with them.

Your advertising would be appreciated. Otherwise, please comment below with a recommended article, or recommend your own law firm to help people with needs that are peculiar to families with mentally ill members and dependents with developmental disabilities. AIMI's main objective is getting such families the information that they need. Thank you in advance for your help making Legal Victories possible for families with such challenges.

Call and write with information about legal victories you wish to highlight. 

Messages will be responded to within 24 hours, or please try again.
Email
MLJ@HumanRightsDemand.com
MaryLovesJustice Neal
MaryLovesJustice@gmail.com
Phone (678)531.0262 (cellphone) or (571)335-1741 (Google voice)
I endure First Amendment rights violations, as evidenced in "Justice Gagged"
http://JusticeGagged.blogspot.com
See our schedule of Blogtalkradio programs on "Human Rights Demand" and "NNIA1"
http://MLJradio.blogspot.com
Please see a list of MaryLovesJustice Blogs and Radio Shows
http://marylovesjustice.blogspot.com/2014/03/marylovesjustice-blogs-and-radio-shows.html
New this year: Book authors are invited to inquire about having your books featured by MaryLovesJustice. Only books about social, legal, or economic justice issues are featured at this time.
http://MaryLovesJustice.blogspot.com
If stalkers render any of the nine(9) links inoperable, simply copy/paste them into a new tab to escape censorship. If the problem persists, paste them into an email message to view the spaces and percent signs that stalkers may have inserted. Remove those and put the links into a new tab. You can also simply Google the titles to reach the censored data. Thanks.

Lael Brown, et al. Prevailed Against The Cochran Firm Frauds

USDC, Northern District of West Virginia
1:10cv110 Judge Keeley
Brown, et al. vs. The Cochran Firm Frauds
Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Motion to Dismiss
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7OOCl9xjk33cnVBd2pyLVYzVUE/view?usp=sharing

ANOTHER former client of The Cochran Firm has sued for fraud - Lael Brown, et al. The Brown lawsuit against The Cochran Firm was successful, unlike most others. The Cochran Firm seems to have the same immunity as police officers do in American courts. Christopher Tucker is another former client alleging fraud and malpractice in a lawsuit against The Cochran Firm. His case is discussed in the next article in this "Legal Victories" blog. Tucker said the Brown case is similar to his, in that:

     (1) Both cases had the same supervising attorney - Anthony Partipilo, whose law license is now suspended by the California Bar because of misconduct in other cases; and

     (2) The Cochran Firm overcharged Brown and Tucker, then in each case got a local attorney at a much reduced fee to actually represent them. Brown signed contract with The Firm believing that a lawyer from The Firm would really represent the defendant, not a local lawyer who The Firm paid only $5,400 of the $27,900 that Brown paid The Cochran Firm. Likewise, Tucker paid The Cochran Firm over $12,000 for defense, but The Cochran Firm hired a local attorney to actually defend Tucker for $500.

The Cochran Firm misuses Johnnie Cochran's name and legacy to lure unsuspecting clients to The Firm. It charges exorbitant fees for criminal defense and then hires local lawyers to handle many, if not most, of its cases. In Christopher Tucker's case, the local attorney refused to sign an acknowledgement that he had been fully briefed on the case when he was asked to tell that lie. Both Brown's and Tucker's cases were in criminal court. The Cochran Firm also defrauds clients in civil court actions, such as the Neal family.

NO attorney was hired by The Firm to actually represent the Neals in a wrongful death civil action case against Memphis Shelby County Jail regarding the "Wrongful Death of Larry Neal" (Google the name). In fact, The Cochran Firm used U.S. Mail fraud to write to the Neals about legal work that was not really being done while the Tennessee statute of limitations passed. The Cochran Firm apparently decided to help Shelby County Government officials avoid accountability for killing Larry Neal, a 54-year-old mentally ill heart patient who under undisclosed circumstances after 18 days of secret incarceration. The defendant in the Brown case also has mental health issues. Although The Firm accepted $27,900 to represent Brown, Nazis think of mentally challenged people as being "useless eaters" and might prefer for them to be dead like Larry is or imprisoned, like the defendant faced in the Brown case.

The Cochran Firm claimed a jurisdictional issue existed in the Brown and Tucker malpractice cases against The Firm. Regarding "Neals v. The Cochran Firm," The Cochran Firm actually disclaimed having any law offices in the State of Georgia, which was a fraud on the court. The law office of Cochran Cherry Givens & Smith in Atlanta also had itself declared to be totally unrelated to the national office of The Cochran Firm and any of its affiliates. Ironically, The Cochran Firm now declares itself to be a single law firm with numerous offices in defense of its former partner's allegations of The Firm's RICO Act Racketeering - an about face. The McMurray matter is ongoing in California courts. One judge wisely recused herself.

The Cochran Firm wanted the Brown and Tucker cases tried in California, so perhaps The Cochran Firm has some "understanding" with courts in California like it seems to have in Georgia. That transfer was refused in the Brown's West Virginia case and should also be refused in Tucker's  Oklahoma case. Plaintiffs can sue under the diversity rule when defendants reside in a separate state. The Neals sued under the diversity rule in federal court after Judge Wendy Shoob of Georgia Superior Court falsely declared in 2006 that The Cochran Firm has no law offices within the State of Georgia, but the federal judge was also a disappointment.

Federal Judge Timothy Batten in Atlanta ordered that it was "immaterial" that The Cochran Firm scoundrels defrauded the Neals in order to prevent our lawsuit against the jail, which secretly arrested and murdered Larry Neal and engaged in an elaborate cover-up with other government agencies to prevent disclosure. In other words, murders and conspiracies to hide murders were excused by Judge Batten. This year, the matter goes before International Court. See AIMI vs. USA case at http://AIMI-humanrights.blogspot.com

We congratulate Brown and other plaintiffs who prevailed against The Cochran Firm frauds. Apparently, The Firm is not above the law in every court. That makes the Brown case a significant Legal Victory!

The Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Motion to Dismiss is below.

Legal Victory Re Cochran Firm Fraud

https://www.scribd.com/doc/254417946/Legal-Victory-Re-Cochran-Firm-Fraud

Read about Christopher Tucker's lawsuit against The Cochran Firm at the next article in Legal Victories blog. Hear and share Tucker's interview at Human Rights Demand channel, taped January 7, 2015.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/humanrightsdemand/2015/01/07/christopher-tucker-vs-the-cochran-firm-and-oklahoma-city-pd

Call and write with information about legal victories you wish to highlight.
Messages will be responded to within 24 hours, or please try again.
MaryLovesJustice Neal
MaryLovesJustice@gmail.com
Phone (678)531.0262 or (571)335-1741
I endure First Amendment rights violations, as evidenced in "Justice Gagged"
http://JusticeGagged.blogspot.com
See our schedule of Blogtalkradio programs on "Human Rights Demand"
http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/human-rights-demand-channel.html
Please see a list of MaryLovesJustice Blogs and Radio Shows
http://marylovesjustice.blogspot.com/2014/03/marylovesjustice-blogs-and-radio-shows.html
New this year: Book authors are invited to inquire about having your books featured by MaryLovesJustice. Only books about social, legal, or economic justice issues are featured at this time.
http://MaryLovesJustice.blogspot.com
If stalkers render any of the ten(10) links inoperable, simply copy/paste them into a new tab to escape censorship. Thanks.

U.S. Codes Are Legal Victories

U.S. Code 42, Sec. 1983 and U.S. Code 242, Sec. 18 are legal victories for oppressed people. There is a growing necessity for lawyers to represent African Americans and other minority status people whose rights have been and are being violated. Christopher Tucker is one such individual. Tucker is a mild-tempered man who works as an armed security guard. He alleged targeting and brutality by the Oklahoma Police Department and fraud by The (Johnnie) Cochran Firm. Please hear about Tucker's lawsuit against The Cochran Firm and Oklahoma Police Department. Share Tucker's interview at Human Rights Demand channel, taped January 7, 2015. It is available for listening 24/7 at
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/humanrightsdemand/2015/01/07/christopher-tucker-vs-the-cochran-firm-and-oklahoma-city-pd

Christopher Tucker alleges that on July 3, 2010, he was badly beaten and Tasered by Oklahoma City police officers without any provocation. He had a verbal confrontation with his girlfriend and police were called. By the time police arrived at the house, Tucker had already removed his personal possessions and left the scene. There was no allegation of physical assault. Police arrived promptly and set out after Tucker, although they understood that no laws had been broken. After Tucker was beaten and Tasered by police, he was then charged with resisting arrest. 

Tucker says that when he went to District Attorney David Prater's office to file criminal charges against his arresting officers, he was interviewed by Officer Larry Baker. Officer Baker looked over the paperwork that Tucker gave him and stated that he would have handled the situation differently: Officer Baker said he would have shot Tucker.

Tucker has had four surgeries since the incident and is scheduled for another. He experiences migraine headaches, presumably from the electric shock, and excruciating pain doing certain movements from the kicking. Tucker is an armed security guard who has worked alongside officers in the sheriff's department. He recognized that his rights had been violated, and he sued for police brutality. Tucker, a black man, was given an all-white jury and lost his case against police. He did not have the finances to file appeal timely.

TARGETING AND INTIMIDATION. Since Tucker made it plain that he planned to sue police for his abuse, he was apparently targeted by the Oklahoma City Police Department for retaliation. When he was released from jail on the resisting arrest charge, Tucker informed the hospital that he wanted to make a police report about the injuries the medical personnel documented and have photographs taken of his Taser burns. Tucker says he was Tasered by two police officers, one of whom was not certified in Taser use. Oklahoma is said to be the Taser death capitol of America (see a link about that designation below). 

The hospital apparently called the police to take the report and photograph Tucker's injuries. A police officer appeared in Tucker's hospital room, where Tucker was alone, and stood silently with his arms folded. When Tucker asked why he was there, the officer announced that he was one of the eleven policemen who were at the scene during Tucker's arrest. For Oklahoma City Police Department to send one of Tucker's potential defendants to take the police report was inappropriate, to say the least. Tucker considered it to be extreme intimidation.

Tucker has been stopped by police numerous times since his lawsuit was dismissed, although at no time was Tucker committing any crime. He had never been stopped by police before July 3, 2010, the night of his only arrest. During one traffic stop, Tucker and his teenage son were held in the back of a police car for 1.5 hours in clear view of the public. It was humiliating for them both. Moreover, Tucker was frightened for himself and his son, taking into account his beating and Tasering without provocation.

The most frightening development is that Oklahoma City Police Department has posted a picture of Tucker on its bulletin board with information stating that Tucker is combative and dangerous to police and that Tucker is disgruntled over losing his lawsuit alleging police brutality. Tucker was informed about this targeting by an officer, and it was admitted to an NAACP officer who called the Oklahoma City Police Department to verify that Tucker's photo is before police officers labeling him as being disgruntled, combative, and a danger to police. 

Tucker said that he has at no time made threats to police officers, and neither has he taken any actions that can reasonably be perceived as threatening to them. Tucker merely operated within the law to file a police report about his abuse and a civil action in District Court. He operated within his rights and according to the law. Tucker continues to work as an armed guard. He fears that Oklahoma City Police Department made him a target for another beating and false arrest or possibly worse. Tucker seeks an attorney to sue the Oklahoma City Police Department for its pattern of intimidation and targeting as well as libel and defamation of character.

U.S. Code 242, Section 18 protects Americans, particularly minorities, from police retaliation that Tucker describes. The continuous traffic stops and provocative slander about Tucker on the Oklahoma City Police Department's bulletin board appear to be punitive actions against Tucker for operating in his "rights that are protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States." The code states:

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

U.S. Code 42, Section 1983 states:

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

U.S. Codes 42, Section 1983 and U.S. Code 242, Sec. 18 are indeed great legal victories. However, victims of abusive practices under the color of law must have legal representation to make America "be true to what she said on paper" (MLK). Lawyers who are interested in speaking with Tucker about his intimidation, targeting, and slander are invited to email him at kingctuck25@cox.net .

Another African American plans to sue a police department for targeting him for continuous police stops and unwarranted arrests. New York Daily News reports, "Florida police were accused of racial profiling after stopping a man 258 times, charging him with trespassing at work. In the last four years Earl Sampson, 28, has been questioned by police 258 times, searched more than 100 times, jailed 56 times, and arrested for trespassing 62 times. The majority of these citations occurred at his place of work, a Miami Gardens convenience store where the owner says police are racially profiling [his employee]."
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/police-stop-man-258-times-charge-trespassing-work-article-1.1526422

Tucker's lawsuit against The (Johnnie) Cochran Firm has joined the list of lawsuits by former clients, lawyers, and law partners who sued The Cochran Firm for fraud, racism, and deliberate malpractice since Johnnie Cochran's death. Tucker is number 15 on the list at 
"Beware of Treacherous Lawyers - The Cochran Firm." 
http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2013/01/beware-of-treacherous-lawyers-cochran.html

OKC Is Taser Death Capital of the U.S.
http://thislandpress.com/roundups/okc-is-taser-death-capital-of-the-us/

Defamation and Malicious Falsehoods
http://catalogue.pearsoned.co.uk/assets/hip/gb/hip_gb_pearsonhighered/samplechapter/140825414X.pdf

Read about Tucker's lawsuit against The Cochran Firm at this link in The Cochran Firm Fraud blog
http://cochranfirmfraud.blogspot.com/2015/01/christopher-tucker-vs-cochran-firm.html
Paragraph 1 repeated: U.S. Code 42, Sec. 1983 and U.S. Code 242, Sec. 18 are legal victories for oppressed people. There is a growing necessity for lawyers to represent African Americans and other minority status people whose rights have been and are being violated. Christopher Tucker is one such individual. Tucker works as an armed security guard. He alleged targeting and brutality by the Oklahoma Police Department and fraud by The (Johnnie) Cochran Firm. Tucker spoke on "Human Rights Demand" channel at Blogtalkradio about these violations. Hear and share Tucker's interview at Human Rights Demand channel, taped January 7, 2015. It is available for listening 24/7 at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/humanrightsdemand/2015/01/07/christopher-tucker-vs-the-cochran-firm-and-oklahoma-city-pd

Call and write with information about legal victories you wish to highlight.

Messages will be responded to within 24 hours, or please try again.

MaryLovesJustice@gmail.com

Phone (678)531.0262 or (571)335-1741

I endure First Amendment rights violations, as evidenced in "Justice Gagged" 

http://JusticeGagged.blogspot.com

See our schedule of Blogtalkradio programs on "Human Rights Demand" 

http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/human-rights-demand-channel.html

Please see a list of MaryLovesJustice Blogs and Radio Shows

http://marylovesjustice.blogspot.com/2014/03/marylovesjustice-blogs-and-radio-shows.html

New this year: Book authors are invited to inquire about having your books featured by MaryLovesJustice. See

http://MaryLovesJustice.blogspot.com

If stalkers prevent your access to data at any of the twelve(12) links in this article, simply copy the link and drop it into a fresh tab.

Getting Away With Murder, by George Mallinckrodt

The First Amendment is a legal victory that continues to make victories possible for Americans, especially in cases where government officials engage in corruption and cover-ups. Prisoner abuse is a prevalent problem in America's domestic correctional institutions. When prison officials and Department of Justice officials sweep prisoner abuse under the rug, media companies and ordinary citizens frequently use their First Amendment rights to expose and oppose brutality and wrongful deaths that might otherwise go undisclosed. George Mallinckrodt published a book about abuse and an inmate's murder that have not yet been corrected in the Florida prison system. The book is called "Getting Away with Murder."

You are invited to interviews with Mallinckrodt on "Human Rights for Prisoners March," a radio broadcast hosted by Mary Neal at "Human Rights Demand" channel on Blogtalkradio. Call (347)857-3293 to comment or ask questions.

"Getting Away with Murder": A George Mallinckrodt Interview
The George Mallinckrodt interviews are scheduled for Sunday, Jan. 11 at 3pm EST, and Thur., Jan. 15 at 9pm EST. The shows will be archived for access 24/7. The link for the January 11 broadcast is
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/humanrightsdemand/2015/01/11/getting-away-with-murder-a-george-mallinckrodt-interview

George Mallinckrodt is a psychotherapist who formerly worked in Florida prisons counseling mentally ill inmates. He observed an alarming pattern of abuse by corrections officers and complained. He lost his job. Months later, he learned about the death by scalding of Darren Rainey, a 50-year-old black mentally ill inmate who guards scalded to death in a small shower. Rainey was tortured under a strong spray of 180°F water (water boils at 212°F). Rainey's skin had to be scraped from the shower after his body was removed. No charges were filed after Rainey's homicide, and no autopsy report was released to date. Disgusted by the lack of accountability. Mallinckrodt then published a book about abused mentally ill inmates, murderous corrections officers, and the Florida Department of Corrections called "Getting Away with Murder."

"The Florida Department of Corrections is riddled with amoral, sadistic sociopaths and the people who support, enable, and cover-up their crimes." ~ @GeoMallinckrodt (at Twitter)

"If what is done to mentally ill Florida inmates was done in the military, these would be considered war crimes." ~George Mallinckrodt

Author's Website
http://georgemallinckrodt.com/

Author's Blog
http://www.georgemallinckrodt.com/blog.htm

Order the book: "Getting Away with Murder".
http://www.amazon.com/Getting-Away-With-Murder-Story/dp/1500705624

Power concedes nothing without a demand; it never has, and it never will. ~Frederick Douglass

Call and write with information about legal victories you wish to highlight.

Messages will be responded to within 24 hours, or please try again.

MaryLovesJustice@gmail.com

Phone (678)531.0262 or (571)335-1741

I endure First Amendment rights violations, as evidenced in "Justice Gagged"

http://JusticeGagged.blogspot.com

See our schedule of Blogtalkradio programs on "Human Rights Demand" channel 

http://freespeakblog.blogspot.com/2014/02/human-rights-demand-channel.html

Please see a list of MaryLovesJustice Blogs and Radio Shows

http://marylovesjustice.blogspot.com/2014/03/marylovesjustice-blogs-and-radio-shows.html

Thanks.